Financial Times: 'Onmiddellijke problemen' dreigen voor Suriname voor terugbetalen leningen

De Ware Tijd: 'Berichtgeving kan verstrekkende gevolgen hebben en het moeilijker maken voor Suriname om op de internationale markt opnieuw geld te lenen'


Er dreigen 'onmiddellijke problemen' voor Suriname voor het terugbetalen van leningen. Daarvoor waarschuwt de gezaghebbende Amerikaanse krant Financial Times op 27 december (zie onderaan). 

Suriname is één van de zes landen in de wereld op wie deze voorspelling van toepassing is. Het is voor het eerst dat deze krant Suriname zo nadrukkelijk noemt. Verantwoordelijke minister Gillmore Hoefdraad kon zondag niet bereikt worden voor een reactie, schrijft de Nederlandse hoofdredacteur Armand Snijders vandaag, maandag 6 januari 2020, in de Ware Tijd.

De waarschuwing komt van van Matt Murphy, institutional portfoliomanager van Eaton Vance, één van de oudste beleggingsbeheerders in de Verenigde Staten, en is eind december opgetekend in een stuk van de vooraanstaande columnist Jonathan Wheatley. Die beschrijft de wereldwijde economische vooruitzichten. Suriname wordt met Argentinië, Ecuador, Libanon, Kameroen en Papoea-Nieuw-Guinea genoemd als landen die problemen hebben om hun schulden af te lossen.

Voor de situatie die wordt geschetst, waarschuwen verschillende deskundigen in binnen- en buitenland al jaren en die ontwikkeling begint nu dus ook de aandacht te trekken van belangrijke internationale media. Dat daaraan zelfs in de als zeer betrouwbaar geachte Financial Times aandacht aan wordt besteed, is veelzeggend, aldus Snijders. 'Dit kan verstrekkende gevolgen hebben en het moeilijker maken voor Suriname om op de internationale markt opnieuw geld te lenen', volgens de hoofdredacteur van de Ware Tijd.

In de afgelopen jaren zijn er voor vele honderden miljoenen Amerikaanse dollars aan leningen afgesloten, terwijl de overheidsuitgaven zijn toegenomen. Maatregelen om de inkomsten te vergroten zijn vrijwel allemaal faliekant mislukt. Ook adviezen van het Internationaal Monetair Fonds om subsidies op onder meer elektriciteit en brandstof af te bouwen en het omvangrijke ambtenarenapparaat te saneren, zijn in de wind geslagen.


https://www.ft.com/content/6accfff6-24d0-11ea-9a4f-963f0ec7e134?ftcamp=traffic/partner/feed_headline/us_yahoo/auddev&yptr=yahoo

The challenges emerging markets investors must confront in 2020

The US and global economies seem supportive, but the sector is replete with risks

Jonathan Wheatley

Jonathan Wheatley December 27 2019


Conditions appear benign for emerging markets going into 2020. 

Analysts expect the US economy to grow at a steady pace: neither so quickly as to suck risk appetite out of emerging-market assets, nor so slowly as to erode confidence in the global environment. The Federal Reserve is expected to leave interest rates unchanged, while many EM central banks continue their easing cycles. China can be relied on to provide enough stimulus to keep its own outlook buoyant, providing support for the rest of the emerging world. 

Prospects for investors should be bright, then. But they face two difficulties. One is how to make the most of these conditions while dodging trouble in individual countries. The other is that the benign outlook itself may be an illusion. 

Among those focused on the former problem is Matt Murphy, institutional fixed income portfolio manager at Eaton Vance in Boston. 

“The macro environment is really not bad for EM risk,” he said. “But there are serious concerns in the large emerging markets because of a deterioration in fundamentals. In the big names, nothing good has happened.” 

He points to political and economic difficulties in markets with big index weights such as Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, Poland and Russia, and to immediate problems of keeping up debt repayments in Argentina, Ecuador and Lebanon, as well as the smaller frontier markets of Suriname, Cameroon and Papua New Guinea. His approach: ignore the benchmark indices and look for returns in the likes of Serbia, Egypt and Ukraine. 

Dodging trouble in big and small markets has become harder in recent months. Previously, crises in places such as Argentina and Turkey were well contained. But investors were blindsided in October when protests erupted on the streets of Chile — formerly an oasis of stability — and spread to other countries in Latin America including Colombia, another economy previously seen as a rare bright spot. Some investors began to worry that reform momentum in Brazil, which had been gathering pace with the passage of a landmark pension reform, would stall. 

So far, contagion has not spread beyond Latin America. But growth has disappointed in sub-Saharan Africa, in emerging Europe and even in Asia. India, previously tipped by some to take up the slack as Chinese growth inevitably slows, has fallen short of expectations. 

So the health of the US economy will be especially significant for EMs next year. Many investors are banking on strong employment and consumer demand to keep the pace of growth not far below this year’s. 

But several analysts disagree. Stephanie Pomboy of MacroMavens — who has long questioned the resilience of the US economy — notes that despite low unemployment and low debt service costs among consumers, US inventory levels have been persistently high and US companies have been unable to pass on the costs of raised import tariffs to retail prices. Demand has failed to pick up, she argues, because the US consumer, rather than consuming, has been saving ever more aggressively since the housing crisis of 2008-09. She does not expect that to change next year. 

Erik Norland, senior economist at the CME Group, argues that the US economy has been held back by an overly-aggressive Federal Reserve that raised interest rates by more than it should have, leaving US monetary policy tight even after recent rate cuts. That has negative consequences for global growth and for EMs in particular, he said. 

“It was Fed tightening in the 1990s that led to the Mexican, Asian and Russian crises. A tight Fed is not good for emerging markets.” 

He expects slowing growth in China to be a drag on emerging markets next year, as the global economy slows from its pace in 2019. 

Piotr Matys, an analyst at Rabobank, is gloomier still, expecting the US to go into a mild recession. 

“Once the Fed realises that the risk of recession is much higher and starts cutting interest rates aggressively, starting in April, it will be too late,” he said. “This is one reason why it is hard to have a constructive view on emerging markets, apart from a short-term relief rally on the back of the phase-one trade deal [between the US and China].” 

Rather than a recovery, he expects EM assets to continue their recent pattern of sharp moves in both directions — a continuation of the inflows and outflows that have mirrored the baffling US-China trade talks. 

With the short-term issue of a phase one deal out of the way, he argues, investors’ horizons will be dominated by longer-term concerns such as intellectual property rights, access to China’s market and Chinese state support. None of that is likely to be resolved quickly. 

Even if the dollar does remain supportive for emerging markets next year, the sector will face plenty of headwinds.